Black South have earned the title of xenophobia across Africa, it has become a name associated to South Africans with the recent evictions of foreigners.
There is a particular kind of rage that lives in a man who cannot accept the word no. It is not the rage of hunger or of war or of injustice it is smaller than all of those, and more dangerous, because it is personal. It is the rage of entitlement stripped bare, of a man who has decided that a woman's body, a woman's time, a woman's future, belongs to him simply because he desired it. In South Africa, this rage has a body count. Every week, sometimes every few days, a young woman is shot, stabbed, strangled, or burned not by a stranger in the shadows, but by a man she knew, a man she refused, a man who could not locate within himself the basic human architecture required to hear the word no and walk away.
This is not a crime of passion. Passion does not reload. Passion does not stalk a woman to her workplace and shoot her in front of her colleagues. Passion does not wait outside a church, a school, a taxi rank, with a weapon already drawn. What South Africa is witnessing what it has been witnessing for decades while its politicians issue condolences and its police statistics climb is not passion. It is punishment. It is men using lethal force to penalize women for the audacity of self-determination. For the crime of having a preference. For the unforgivable act of choosing themselves.
And the women have spoken. Loudly, clearly, at marches and in newspapers and in the digital squares of social media where the names of the dead are recited like a liturgy that never seems to end. They have named the pattern. They have named the culture the toxic, swaggering entitlement that teaches boys from the time they can walk that masculinity is dominance, that love is ownership, that rejection is humiliation requiring a violent response. They have named the government's apathy the underfunded shelters, the police officers who send women home to the men trying to kill them, the courts that move so slowly that restraining orders arrive after the funeral. The women of South Africa have done everything except be believed at the scale their crisis demands.
And so, quietly, and then not so quietly, they made another choice.
They looked around at the men arriving from Nigeria, from Zimbabwe, from Senegal, from Ethiopia, from Pakistan and Bangladesh and China men who came to South Africa with little more than ambition and the willingness to work and some of them found there what they could not find at home. Gentleness. Patience. A man who could be told no without the temperature in the room shifting to something dangerous. A man who asked rather than demanded, who courted rather than cornered, who understood that a woman's company is a gift and not a debt she owes the nearest man with desire. Foreigners began to marry South African women. Households formed. Children were born. Lives were built across the lines of nationality, quietly and without asking permission.
This is where the other rage enters the story.
Because the South African man who cannot handle rejection from a woman is often the same man who cannot handle the sight of a foreigner thriving on soil he considers exclusively his. The logic is identical entitlement. The belief that certain things belong to him by birthright: the women, the jobs, the streets, the country itself. When a Zimbabwean man runs a small shop with discipline and earns the loyalty of a neighborhood, the entitled man does not ask what he can learn from that work ethic. He asks why that foreigner is eating what should be his. When a Nigerian man wins the heart of a South African woman through simple decency, the man who terrorizes women does not examine his own behavior. He reaches instead for the language of nationalism, of purity, of invasion because it is always easier to blame the outsider than to look inward at what the outsider's presence reveals about you.
Xenophobia in South Africa wears the costume of economic grievance. It speaks in the language of unemployment, of housing shortages, of a government that has failed its people since the euphoria of 1994 slowly gave way to the grey reality of corruption, load-shedding, and a poverty line that millions cannot see over from where they stand. These grievances are real. The failure of the post-apartheid state to deliver equally and honestly to its Black citizens is real and documented and infuriating. But grievance, however legitimate, does not explain why the answer is always the body of a foreigner set on fire in the street. It does not explain why the Somali shopkeeper is burned out rather than the politician who stole the housing budget. It does not explain why a Mozambican man is beaten to death while the factory owner who pays poverty wages goes home to his suburb unmolested.
The government watches. This too must be said plainly. South African governments, across administrations and party reshuffles and commissions of inquiry, have perfected the art of performing concern without enacting it. After each wave of xenophobic violence 2008, 2015, 2019, and the smaller, quieter eruptions in between that never quite make international headlines there are statements. There are calls for calm. There are promises of investigation. And then the cameras move on, the statements are filed, and the structural conditions that produce both the femicide and the xenophobia inequality, impunity, a police service that does not inspire confidence, a justice system that does not inspire fear in those who should fear it remain exactly as they were. The government's apathy is not passive. It is active. It is a choice, repeated consistently across years, to manage optics rather than address causes.
What ties all of this together the dead women, the burned foreign shops, the jealousy dressed as nationalism is the same unexamined wound. A country that was told for generations that power was violence, that having is taking, that those below you exist to serve your needs and those above you deserve your fury. Apartheid did not only impoverish Black South Africans materially. It impoverished the moral imagination of an entire society. It taught that the answer to powerlessness is to find someone smaller to dominate. And when the formal system of domination ended, the habit did not. It simply found new targets. Women. Foreigners. Anyone who could be framed as the reason for one's suffering, anyone whose success or happiness or simple existence could be read as theft.
The South African woman who chooses a foreigner is not betraying her country. She is surviving it. She is making a rational calculation often at social cost, sometimes at the cost of her own family's acceptance that her life is worth more than loyalty to a pattern that kills her. She deserves that choice without being made to feel like a traitor. And the foreigner who builds a life in South Africa, who fills gaps in local economies, who raises families and pays taxes and contributes to the fabric of communities that would otherwise have less he deserves to do so without the fear that this week's political frustration will express itself through his front window and a can of petrol.
South Africa is capable of extraordinary things. It has shown this before. But it will not find its way through this by blaming the Zimbabwean, or punishing the woman, or setting fire to the Nigerian. It will find its way through only by doing the hardest thing looking honestly at what it has made of its men, what it has denied its women, and what it owes the strangers it invited in and then left to the mercy of its unresolved fury.
That reckoning has not yet come. The women are still dying. The foreigners are still burning. And the government is still, somewhere in Pretoria, composing its next statement of concern.
Dedicated to every South African woman who chose her life over his ego, and every foreigner who came in peace and was met with fire.
No comments:
Post a Comment